in

It may be interesting to look into what objectification is……how the sense of…

It may be interesting to look into what objectification is……how the sense of objects is generated and maintained.

No one outside of oneself is doing this……

….. there is nothing outside of oneself……. that is making itself to appear as an object……… to oneself.

What makes the object seem to be out there……… as an existing thing with its own qualities…….. is the seeming relationship between an object and a subject…… across a distance and over a period of time.

The subject has to be placed (located)……… just as much as the object does……. in order that this sense of objectification occur.

Is one aware immediately……… as the subject is placed in relation to the object………. the object…that in turn is getting placed in relation to the subject?

If so ……. one is neither the subject nor the object.

One has no quality ……… not even awareness…… which emerges as a quality along with an observation.

How does objectification happen?

For example……say one sees a car …the car seems to be out there……. lets say a blue Ford Montero.

It seems like the blueness……. the shininess……….. the visual outline of it….

….. all belong to that car, that sits out there ……..say on a street.

One knows that if one has the key for it……… one can sit inside and drive it.

One knows where it is………. what its qualities are……… what will it do…… in certain cause-and-effect sequences.

Yet, the blueness isn’t in the car.

The blueness is in one’s eyes…….. and one’s memory.

Without eyes and memory………..there is no blueness.

And the same is the case with the street-ness…….. the key-ness……… the driving-ness……… and all the cause-and-effect sequences.

The car…… street……world….. eyes…….. memory…

…. a moment of experience.

The thought of what I want/what I don’t want….. spiritually, materially, physically, meta-physically………

……… the array of infinitude cause-and-effect sequencings………. are all co-arising and mutually defining.

One is aware of this………… as the co-arising-mutually defining(s)…… seemingly…….happening in time.

One understands the mutuality of locating………. and the co-arising of subject/object configurations…

…. of awareness/object scenarios.

One being aware as such……….. finds that all dilemma….

….. all sense of conflictual opposition….

….. dissolves automatically.

Without effort…… without belief……… without intentionality.

For effort, belief, intentions…..no matter what their content……is once again seen to be yet another co-arising-mutually defining hoopla.

Even the worst conflict and the most difficult experiences ….

….. say the current earthquake in China killing hundreds….or the massacres in Middle East…

…. or the experiences of violence on children ……

….. all of such experiences…… co-arise choicelessly.

An understanding…which is neither in time……..nor in the timeless….

…..impersonal………not a possession……… not to be had (or lost)………..not needing to be had……

…… not located “in” any body or any person.

….(a biological body with a label is seen to be another co-arising-mutually defining gizmo)…..

And not something one person has, as a quality of that person………. and which another person lacks.

One “now” understands this sense of objectification………… the sense of encountering objects (subtle or gross)…

…. as it happens…….. and sees how the sense of object gets “conferred” and located….

…. and how in the very process……….. the sense of a subject(in relation to the sense of an object)…

… is projected and located.



Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

The listening through ear-phones …. click on: And sway and whirl and da…

What do you have to say about the neo-advaitic trend/fad occurring. Nothing need…